University of Texas at Arlington Unit 2 Technical Object Description Discussion

Question Description

Unit 2 Final Draft, Technical Object Description

  • Due Wednesday by 11:59pm
  • Points 100
  • Submitting a file upload
  • File Types pdf

Technical Object Description

This assignment asks that you select a technical object and write a description of its looks, features, and functions. In completing this assignment, you will learn how to define and describe a technical object to someone who has little knowledge of it. You must examine an actual object in your possession.

When selecting a technical object there are some objects that are not allowed for this assignment. These include: smartphones, pocket calculators, video game console or controllers, and fitness trackers due to the internet having easily available technical specifications of these items. You are not to copy/paste and cite someone else’s technical specifications of an object. That is not the point of this assignment. Rather, you are to conduct the measurements yourself and conduct light research. The light research includes technical information of the object you may not have, for example, the exact type of metal used in the object, the wattage or frequency information. Nor may you use any of the 4 objects (lamp, toothbrush, scissors, can opener) used in the Technical Object discussion board. You can not earn higher than a 60 on the assignment if you use any of the precluded items (smart phones, pocket calculators, video game consoles or controllers, fitness trackers, lamp, scissors, toothbrush or can opener). Also, remember that you are writing an objective, professional description of the object, not a commercial ad for it. Keep your language objective and precise.

Assignment Guidelines

You will choose your own topic (with exception of the precluded technical objects listed in the previous section) for this assignment. The subject of your description must be a technical object (e.g., clock radio, stapler, tongs, blender, food processor, etc.). Because you must accurately describe an object in at least 500 words, do not pick something too simple such as a paper clip. Choose a topic that is complex but manageable. Once you have identified a technical object, research it. Take time to learn about what the parts are called, and how the parts work. This might require you to read background information or otherwise inform yourself about the topic.

Audience and Content Requirements

Your primary audience would be someone who has little experience with the object that you are describing (e.g., if you select a stapler, then you need to imagine an audience of people who have little experience with the object, perhaps children).

Regardless of the object, your final paper should be at least 500 words; you must include ALL of the following contents in your description (given in order of how the content should appear in your paper):

  • Introduction (DO NOT label the introduction “introduction” per APA guidelines)
    • Orient your audience by providing a one-sentence definition of the object (first sentence)
    • Preview its various parts (2-3 sentences)
    • Discuss its uses and functions (1-2 sentences)
    • Preview the content of your description (1 sentence)
  • Detailed Description of the Object
    • Describe each part of the object in detail, including its dimensions, materials, principles(s) of operation, function, and relation to other parts (2-3 paragraphs)
    • Use the present tense
    • When introducing a new concept or term, you do need to provide a brief definition for a non-technical audience, e.g.:
      • “The bezel, or outer ring connecting to the lugs, allows the wearer to set a different time zone”
      • You will notice in this sentence the definition for the term “bezel” is a subordinate clause and is not its own separate sentence. You can also use parenthesis for definitions in the same sentence.
  • Conclusion
    • Re-state the major use(s) and function(s) of the object to solicit the audience’s support or awareness of the object

Note: Do not use the second person Point of View or personal pronoun in an object description.

Document Design and Illustrations

Give careful thought to illustrations and design elements: Do not decorate the document; rather use design elements and features to improve navigation and provide consistency and cohesion.

  • Use headings and sub-headings throughout the document (see page 133 for the correct way to size headings and sub-headings). Mark the body and conclusion of your document with headings (again, do not mark the introduction per APA guidelines). Use sub-headings to indicate the beginning of each part/component of the object you are describing.
  • Do not write large chunks of text without headings and sub-headings. Make sure headings and sub-headings are appropriately sized and structured.
  • Single-space the text
  • You must include at least two illustrations.
    • You may create your own, use illustrations from other sources or adapt illustrations from other sources.
    • Make sure you provide source information for all illustrations immediately below each illustration using APA guidelines (see lesson 2.4 for more information).
  • Apply as many of the four basic design principles as possible (Contrast, Repetition, Alignment, Proximity) to enhance the reader’s orientation and understanding of the document.
    • Use serif and sans-serif typefaces for the header and body;
    • Use up to two complementary colors;
    • Place like content in proximity to each other; and,
    • Make sure all of the elements have alignment.
  • Design your document for consistency (grid patterns, margins, justification, white space, indentation, font style and size). Review pages 128-131 in the course textbook

Requirements

  • Keep in mind that your purpose is to describe the object yourself, not rely upon external sources to do the work for you. (Inclusion of cited manufacture specifications will result in a 20-point deduction).
  • Minimum word requirement: 500 words
  • Make sure to include URLs for citations, as needed (Failure to include working URLs will result in-point deductions)

Submission Instructions

  • Submit via Unicheck in Canvas. No assignments will be accepted over email. Assignments incorrectly posted or submitted to the wrong location in Canvas will receive a 10-point deduction
  • Required title for final version: your last name-audience object description. (Failure to properly title your file name will result in a 5-point deduction)
  • Submit the document as a PDF. You will only be able to submit a PDF.
  • Deadlines:
    • First draft due by 11:59pm CT Friday of week 2
    • Peer review due by 11:59pm CT Sunday of week 2
    • Final draft due by 11:59pm CT Wednesday of week 3

Note: On Academic Integrity

You must write the object description yourself. DO NOT copy descriptions you found elsewhere and cite the source. This is not the intellectual purpose of this project. This assignment is to help you learn how to write a technical object description on your own.

You are allowed to consult source material, if necessary–but consult only.

If you copy descriptions you found elsewhere, you cannot get a 60 or above on the assignment, even if you cite the sources in APA.

If more than 30% of your paper (percentage given by Unicheck) is copied from other sources, your assignment will receive a 0, even if the sources are in APA.

If portions (or the entirety) of your paper are copied from other sources without APA attribution, the assignment will be reported to UTA Office of Student Conduct for academic dishonesty.

Rubric

Assignment 2: Object Description

Assignment 2: Object Description

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTerminology (5 pts): The description uses correct terminology and effectively explain the terminology to a non-technical audience.

5 pts

Excellent

Most, if not all, of the terms are defined for the audience.

4 pts

Good

Most of the terms are defined, but not all of them.

3 pts

Average

About half of the terms are defined for the target audience but not all of them.

2 pts

Poor

Less than half of the terms are defined for the target audience.

1 pts

Dour

Hardly any of the terms are defined for the target audience.

0 pts

Grave

None of the terms are defined for the target audience.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction (5 pts): The introduction orients the audience by providing a one-sentence definition of the object. It previews the object’s various parts, discusses the object’s uses and functions. It also previews the content of the description. Conclusion (5 pts): The conclusion re-states the major use(s) and function(s) of the object to solicit the audience’s support or awareness.

5 pts

Excellent

Of the required elements, there are either none missing or one missing.

4 pts

Good

Of the required elements, there are two missing.

3 pts

Average

Of the required elements, there are three missing.

2 pts

Poor

Of the required elements, there are at least three missing and/or the writing does not align with the target audience.

1 pts

Dour

Of the required elements, there are at least three missing, or a missing introduction or conclusion, and/or the writing does not align with the target audience.

0 pts

Grave

Of the required elements, there are at least four missing, or a missing introduction or conclusion, and/or the writing does not align with the target audience.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDetailed Description of the Object (20 pts): The body of the document describes each part of the object in detail, including its dimensions, materials, principle(s) of operation, function, and relation to other parts. It uses the present tense. It explains new concepts or terminology for a non-technical audience.

20 to >18.0 pts

Excellent

The description does give above adequate text about the parts and concepts (20 pts). The description may be missing one of the core details or functions of object (19 pts). The description may be missing two of the core details or functions of the object (18 pts).

18 to >14.0 pts

Good to Average

The description does give adequate text about the parts and concepts and may be missing three of the core details or functions of object (17 pts). There may be missing present tense or present tense usage may be inconsistently applied (16 pts). There may be a mixture of two to three missing core details or functions and missing present tense usage (15 pts). The document does not explain terminology for a non-technical audience consistently and is missing two to three core details and/or missing present tense usage (14 pts).

14 to >12.0 pts

Average

The description does gives an average overview of the parts and concepts and may be missing three or more of the core details or functions of object (13 pts). The description may also rely upon summary or not give enough detail for the audience, and present tense may be inconsistently applied (12 pts).

12 to >11.0 pts

Poor

The description does gives a below-average overview of the parts and concepts and may be missing three or more of the core details or functions of object (11 pts). The description may also rely upon summary or not give enough detail for the audience, and present tense may be inconsistently applied (10 pts).

11 to >0 pts

Dour to Grave

The description does not provide an overview or describe most of the parts (range between 0-10 pts applied).

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDesign (30 pts): Effective use of the design principles (contrast, alignment, proximity, and repetition). Design features, such as fonts, font sizes, and forms of emphasis are applied consistently. The overall design is clear and consistent.

30 to >27.0 pts

Excellent

CRAP principles are clear (30 pts). There may be one major (29 pts) or two minor (28 pts) inconsistencies in the document. There may be one major and one minor inconsistency (27 pts).

27 to >24.0 pts

Good

CRAP principles are somewhat applied throughout with consistency. (26 pts) There may be two major errors (25 pts) and two minor errors or one major error (24 pts) that detract from the overall balance and structure of the design.

24 to >21.0 pts

Average

CRAP principles are average (23 pts). There may be two major errors and three minor errors (22 pts) or one major error and multiple minor errors (21 pts) that detract from the overall balance and structure of the design.

21 to >18.0 pts

Poor

CRAP principles are below average (20 pts). There may be three major errors (19 pts) or two major and three minor errors (18 pts) or some combination that deter a reader from the document.

18 to >0 pts

Dour to Grave

CRAP principles are inadequate (17 pts). There are multiple errors that impact the overall readability and design (range of 0-16 pts).

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIllustrations (15 pts): There are at least two illustrations. The illustrations are effective, each serving a functional purpose (meaning, it helps the reader better comprehend the task at hand). It is not merely used for decorative purpose. The illustrations are appropriately documented, displayed, and labeled.

15 to >14.0 pts

Excellent

Illustrations are correct (15 pts), and there may be one minor error (14 pts).

14 to >12.0 pts

Good to Average

Illustrations are mostly correct with one major error (13 pts) or two minor errors (12 pts).

12 to >10.0 pts

Average

Illustrations are average with two major errors (11 pts) or three minor errors (10 pts).

10 to >0 pts

Dour to Grave

Illustrations are inadequate (9 pts). Illustrations are below average with multiple errors (range of 0 to 8 pts).

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStyle (15 pts): Present tense is used throughout. Headings are in parallel form. Numbered/bulleted items, if used, are in parallel form. Paragraphs are unified— each paragraph has a single focus, begins with a topic sentence, and develops around a single idea.

15 to >14.0 pts

Excellent

There is a consistent style throughout (15 pts) with the possibility of one minor error (14 pts).

14 to >12.0 pts

Good to Average

There is a above-average style throughout (13 pts) with one major error or two minor errors (12 pts).

12 to >10.0 pts

Average

There is an average style throughout (11 pts) or with two major errors or three minor errors (10 pts).

10 to >0 pts

Dour to Grave

The style is inadequate (9 pts). There is a below average style throughout with multiple errors that impact the overall style of the document (range of 0 – 8 pts).

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics (10 pts): Spelling, APA documentation, grammar, and punctuation are correct. Minimum word requirement is met. Contains all of the required sections.

10 to >9.0 pts

Excellent

Error free (10 pts) or there may be one minor error (9 pts).

9 to >7.0 pts

Good to Average

There may be two major (8 pts) or two minor errors (7 pts).

7 to >5.0 pts

Average

There may be two major errors and one minor (6 pts) or three minor errors (5 pts).

5 to >0 pts

Dour to Grave

Any rating between 0-4 exhibit there are too many errors that impact readability of the document.

10 pts

Total Points: 1

Get 20% Discount on This Paper
Pages (550 words)
Approximate price: -

Try it now!

Get 20% Discount on This Paper

We'll send you the first draft for approval by at
Total price:
$0.00

How it works?

Follow these simple steps to get your paper done

Place your order

Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.

Proceed with the payment

Choose the payment system that suits you most.

Receive the final file

Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.

Our Services

Ace Writing Center has stood as the world’s leading custom essay writing services providers. Once you enter all the details in the order form under the place order button, the rest is up to us.

Essays

Essay Writing Services

At Ace Writing Center, Nowadays, students normally have extremely busy schedules. You will note that some of them have to take on some evening or weekend jobs in order to get some income that can help them to sustain in college or in the university. This can deny them a chance to write all the essays given. Others usually get bombarded with a lot of work by their lecturers. This can still delay such students from working on all their essays. However, some of them usually try to work on all these essays but end up delivering their work late. This can prevent them from graduating since most lecturers are strict on deadlines. If you want to write a business essay, the wise way is to hire an outstanding essay writing service like us, so that you can get the best results. If you are keen, you will note that many companies usually overcharge their customers. Some of them are there only to make money. And in reality, they really don’t care to build a long term commitment with students. You should not choose such companies. You should take your time and choose a reliable company to work with. Ace Writing Center is the ultimate solution for you. We have been offering our writing service for more than 7 years. This is a clear indication that you will get quality essay writing service. We have a wide range of writers who can work on any business essay that you might have. We believe in doing extensive research so that we can provide quality work to all our clients. .

Admissions

Admission and Business Papers

Have you ever had to write an admission essay for college? The majority of students face the same issues when applying to a university or college and many in such situations decide they need professional help to cope with this matter. They get in a situation when the deadline keeps coming closer but lack motivation to start because they are just not sure if their writing skills are strong enough. We have a solution for you! Ace Writing Center is the best admission essay writing service with a large professional team and years of experience in providing high-quality papers to students of all levels and faculties. The mission of our team is to help students make their dreams of entering a good college come true and that’s what we offer!.

Editing

Editing and Proofreading

Sometimes all the words for your paper just flow out of your mind and into your fingers. You type quickly at your keyboard and there they are, your beautiful words right there on the screen. But you have no idea how to polish it up. You may be wishing there was a paper writing service that offered this type of writing service. Look no more! Here at Ace Writing Center, we offer you an editing and proofreading option that you can't find anywhere else..

Coursework

College Essay Writing

In case you are familiar Ace Writing Center, you know the way to distinguish a better company from a cheap one exactly. First of all, poor service website does not have a sufficient support. We think support team is an essential part of success; it has to answer all clients’ questions and be a connecting link between clients and their writers. On our web-service you will get answers about anything you need and your writer will receive all your instructions, assignments and requirements exactly and swiftly. A writing service that we run has got a flexible pricing system that will save you from senseless wastes and many bonus systems that let you sparing money for something important for you.