MGT 560 Module 6 Leadership and Decision Making Discussion

MGT560 Leadership Development
MGT560 CTA: Module 06: Team Leadership: Leadership and Decision Making
As we learned throughout this week, team leadership involves monitoring a team to help
individuals achieve goals and to enhance performance. Please refer to the image below from
Northouse (2022, pp. 464) (already attached).
Jamal works for a technology firm in the KSA. He has been assigned as the team leader of a
group of five engineers, from different countries, responsible for creating new phone
technology. This organization favors the team leadership approach and has given Jamal the
responsibility to monitor and act as needed, to ensure the team is effectively performing.
During the first week of work, Jamal evaluates the overall situation in relation to the team’s
needs and he discovers that the team is not focusing on the goals, there is conflict between
three of the engineers due to communication issues, and there is not enough sharing of
information among several of the engineers due to professional competition and a fear of being
left behind.
Thinking about the above situation, please answer the following:
1- Explain what the team leadership approach is and how it impacts the decision-making
process.
2- Identify the current issues Jamal is encountering. Explain the best way to address these
issues based on the team leadership approach.
3- Determine how a country’s culture and the culture of each team member impacts the team
leadership approach.
4- If you were Jamal, what team model would you use to make the team more successful?
Explain why you selected this team model.
MGT560 Leadership Development
Source: Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and practice (9th ed., pp. 464). Sage
Publications.
Well-written paper should meet the following requirements:
1. Minimum of 5-6 pages in length (double-spaced) related and well explained to all
questions (first introduction, then each question has its own headline, last
conclusion).
2. Required minimum pages does not include the paper outline, title, and reference
pages, and which are never a part of the content minimum requirements.
3. Editing after completing is required once needed (after instructor review feedback).
4. Use University academic writing standards and APA style guidelines and double
spacing.
5. Support your submission with course material concepts, principles, and theories
from the textbook and at least three (03) current, scholarly, peer-reviewed journal
articles. Current articles are those published within the last five years.
MGT560 Leadership Development
6. Assignment will be checked in Turnitin Originality Check Tool prior to submitting to
instructor. Be unique with quality work.
7. Review the attached grading rubric to see how the grading will be for this
assignment.
P.S. this is a (4) marks assignment, so please put my budget limit under consideration
Thank you.
MGT560 Leadership Development
Source: Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and practice (9th ed., pp. 464). Sage
Publications.
SEU MGT560
Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module 6
Exceeds
Expectation
Content, Research, and Analysis
21-25 Points
Requirements
Includes all of the
required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
21-25 Points
Content
Demonstrates
substantial and
extensive
knowledge of the
materials, with no
errors or major
omissions.
25-30 Points
Analysis
Provides strong
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
13-15 Points
Sources
Sources go above
and beyond
required criteria
and are well
chosen to provide
effective
substance and
perspectives on
the issue under
examination.
Mechanics and Writing
5 Points
Demonstrates
Project is clearly
college-level
organized, well
proficiency in
written, and in
organization,
proper format as
grammar and
outlined in the
style.
assignment. Strong
sentence and
paragraph
structure, contains
no errors in
grammar, spelling,
Meets Expectation
Below Expectation
16-20 Points
Includes most of
the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
16-20 Points
Demonstrates
adequate
knowledge of the
materials; may
include some
minor errors or
omissions.
19-24 Points
Provides adequate
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
10-12 Points
Sources meet
required criteria
and are adequately
chosen to provide
substance and
perspectives on the
issue under
examination.
11-15 Points
Includes some of
the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
11-15 Points
Demonstrates fair
knowledge of the
materials and/or
includes some
major errors or
omissions.
4 Points
Project is fairly well
organized and
written and is in
proper format as
outlined in the
assignment.
Reasonably good
sentence and
paragraph
structure, may
include a few
3 Points
Project is poorly
organized and
written and may
not follow proper
format as outlined
in the assignment.
Inconsistent to
inadequate
sentence and
paragraph
development,
13-18 Points
Provides poor
though, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
7-9 Points
Sources meet
required criteria
but are poorly
chosen to provide
substance and
perspectives on the
issue under
examination.
Limited Evidence
6-10 Points
Includes few of the
required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
6-10 Points
Fails to
demonstrate
knowledge of the
materials and/or
includes many
major errors or
omissions.
7-12 Points
Provides little or no
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
4-6 Points
Source selection
and integration of
knowledge from
the course is
clearly deficient.
1-2 Points
Project is not
organized or well
written and is not
in proper format as
outlined in the
assignment. Poor
quality work;
unacceptable in
terms of grammar,
spelling, APA style,
SEU MGT560
Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module 6
APA style, or APA
citations and
references.
Total points possible = 100
minor errors in
grammar, spelling,
APA style, or APA
citations and
references.
and/or includes
numerous or major
errors in grammar,
spelling, APA style
or APA citations
and references.
and APA citations
and references.

Purchase answer to see full
attachment