Assignment: Personality Trait Creativity

Assignment: Personality Trait Creativity

ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT:Assignment: Personality Trait Creativity

How personality traits might be related to creativity

How personality traits might be related to creativity
The assignment

The contribution of surveys to our understanding of how personality traits might be related to creativity – For this assignment you should write an essay.

Method 2: For students conducting a survey project: Drawing on material from Chapter 1 Critical, creative and credible and Chapter 6 Measuring differences in people, critically evaluate the contribution of surveys to our understanding of how personality traits might be related to creativity. How personality traits might be related to creativity.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Word limit: 1500 words (excluding references, the title and any appendices). Write the word count at the end of your essay.

To help with this you should read a chapter that explores your particular method. Then, using that information along with the relevant section of Chapter 1, you should write your essay.

Learning outcomes

TMA 01 addresses the following learning outcomes:

Knowledge of the core areas of psychology:
cognitive psychology
individual differences
social psychology and qualitative methods.
Demonstration of a critical appreciation of the types of evidence and research methods used in psychology.
The ability to construct arguments with appropriate use of psychological concepts, theories and evidence.
The ability to interpret and evaluate the contributions of different kinds of evidence and research methods.
The ability to select, summarise, synthesise and reference appropriately information from different psychological sources, including primary texts. How personality traits might be related to creativity.
The ability to present written material in a coherently organised form, with arguments and information in logical sequence and communicated effectively in a variety of formats.
The ability to employ evidence-based reasoning and to critically examine practical, theoretical and ethical issues.

the contribution of surveys to our understanding of how personality traits might be related to creativity

Student notes for students undertaking survey projects

Title: Drawing on material from Chapter 1 Critical, creative and credibleand Chapter 6 Measuring differences in people, critically evaluate the contribution of surveys to our understanding of how personality traits might be related to creativity.

Word limit: 1500 words (excluding references, the title and any appendices). Write the word count at the end of your essay.

This essay question covers surveys, so the principal sources are Chapter 1 and Chapter 6 of the DE300 textbook. While both chapters explore survey and psychometric methodologies, Chapter 6 is particularly relevant in relation to the question of how psychometric surveys contribute to an understanding of creativity. How personality traits might be related to creativity. Bear in mind a definition of what is meant by ‘psychometric survey’ is going to be useful in deciding what material to select to answer this question.

Section 2 of Chapter 6 covers reliability and validity – two important psychometric characteristics of surveys that are often used to evaluate the quality of survey instruments.

Material in Section 3 of Chapter 6 covers assessment of creativity. Some of the methods reviewed are psychometric tests that are not strictly speaking surveys, although many could be added to a survey instrument to collect data together with other variables. Some of the measures discussed in Section 3.4 clearly do fall under the heading of surveys. Surveys are self-report measures (see definitions in Chapter 1) and so can include psychometric scales, or psychometric tests, provided they can be adapted to a format that lends itself to being distributed as a survey.

Sections 4.1 and 4.2 of Chapter 6 cover personality and creativity specifically, however there is other material on surveys in Chapter 6.

Your task is to ‘critically evaluate’, meaning that you must make a judgement about the contribution of psychometric survey methodology to research and understanding of creativity. The judgement should be about the strengths, weaknesses and worth of the contribution specifically to understanding the relationships between personality and creativity, as well as to an understanding of creativity. How personality traits might be related to creativity.

Your arguments must be based on evidence and reasoning. You will need to consider the debates around survey methodology and creativity, but it is not necessary to include long lists of studies and their findings. Note that the question is asking about the contribution to research, which suggests a discussion not only of theories but also of methodology will be required for a balanced and evaluative answer.

The question has been deliberately left open to allow you to draw on a wider range of materials. Remember you only have 1500 words at your disposal, so you will not be able to cover every issue in the depth that it is covered in the textbook. However, at the same time, you also need to critically evaluate the evidence from survey studies and what they tell us about creativity. This will require you to assess whether such evidence supports the theoretical conclusions of the studies you are using in your answer. In order to evaluate effectively, ask yourself if alternative interpretations of the findings are possible. What weaknesses or limitations do the studies have that might suggest alternative interpretations are possible? What do different approaches to assessing and theorising from surveys tell us about the origins, processes or mechanisms of creativity? How personality traits might be related to creativity. How do the questions used in surveys or the analysis of data shape the type of findings produced?

As well as drawing on material from Chapter 6, you should also draw on material from Chapter 1. Chapter 1 is a more general introduction to methods, with the relevant section here being Section 3, which discusses the uses and limitations of the survey approach. You may need to know this in order to develop your critical evaluation of the material in Chapter 6. Section 3 in Chapter 1 is fairly eclectic theoretically but serves as a good introduction to survey methodology and its strengths and limitations. Some of the general discussions in Sections 1 and 5 may be relevant to help you situate and contrast survey methods within the context of other methods. You will have to give some thought to how you can make this material directly relevant to the essay question. Perhaps you can take the methodological issues highlighted in Section 3 and explore their implications for studies that explore personality and creativity?

You may find it useful to access primary source material referred to in Chapter 6, or indeed other academic source material. To locate additional relevant materials, you could start with one of the primary references in Chapter 6 Section 4 (for example studies that have used the NEO or HEXACO tests) and look for relevant articles that have cited these primary sources, narrowing it down to creativity. Further information about how to find relevant primary source material can be found in the Week 1 library activities referred to in the Study Guide. Please bear in mind that the main material for the TMA should be from Chapter 6. Therefore, while you do need to devote a paragraph or two to Section 3 of Chapter 1, most of your essay will be taken up with relevant material from Chapter 6, particularly from Section 4. How personality traits might be related to creativity.

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Discussion Questions (DQ)

• Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.
• Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.
• One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.
• I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

Weekly Participation

• Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.
• In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.
• Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).
• Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

APA Format and Writing Quality

• Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).
• Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.
• I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

Use of Direct Quotes

• I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.
• As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.
• It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

LopesWrite Policy

• For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
• Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
• Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
• Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

• The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
• Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
• If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
• I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
• As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

Communication

• Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
  • Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
  • Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.