social media and the post recession consumer

social media andthe post recession consumerThe entire argument of my paper is this Post recession consumers aremuch more educaed, much more focused on a good customer service experience and a fair result ofthe product expectaton, and are happy to loudly vocacalize this.Hence, the social proof theory will be closely analyzed to demonstrate how customers post recession look at businesses and marketing and apply social media to their shopping education and experiences as a community. Next, I will examine why successful companies like Amazon,Apply and UPS use strategies in CP and trrain their employees about how to use CP in case by case analysis on order to make the most effective customer service agreement for all will be presented in order to demonstrate the success of some of the companie that have effecgtively utilized CP Focus on the use of CP in business customer service on a case by a case approach using Amazon, Apple and UPS.Look at how they educate their peole to use CP in decisions for a case by case approach. Look at their social media standings and reviews and the customer service anallysis.Analyze it. For consumers please focus on social proof theory and how it is used in post recession consumer media. Must have 25 sources n perect APA all must be scholatly and peer reviewed You must use standard research paper headings.Here are he directins Your paper should include several sections (please use headings and subheadings for an organized paper): 1. An introduction: introduces the communication topic you selected (e.g., social media as the new public sphere) and the significance of studying it, providing an overview of the paper at the end.In the introduction, you orient the reader(s) to your topic generally, define terms, survey some general studies on the issue, and provide an overview of the topics to be discussed in your paper at the end of the introduction.Usually, the introduction is the last part to be written although it appears at the beginning of a paper. Also, you need a title of your paper that reflects its main theme, which can’t be “Final Paper”.2. Literature Review: This is the bulk of your paper, where you go over the major findings of your research. You go over studies that either studied the topic of your selection (or related topics) and studies that either used or researched a theory connected to your topic.Example, if your topic is “Social Media as the New/Global Public Sphere”, your theoretical perspective could be based on Habermas’ concept of the “public sphere.” If your topic is “The Gap between People’s Opinion on the Third Iraqi War and Media’s Portrayals of That War,” then you might use Neumann’s “spiral of silence” theory.3. Discussion: In this section, you provide your analysis and synthesis of your literature findings. How do you read what other scholars concluded? What is missing from the discussion? What are some of the strengths or limitations of these studies?4. Recommendations: What are your recommendations for future research?5. Conclusion: Any final thoughts or remarks on the topic, studies, research methods, directions for future studies, etc. In the process, provide a brief review of your paper.6. References (bibliography): A list (no annotations) of all the references you used in the body of your paper.You should use a minimum of 25 scholarly references and an unlimited number of other references like newspaper and magazine articles, non-scholarly books, etc.less What I wrote here before I used in my last paper so you must change the wording and revise it although the concedpt can be used, it must appear different. Below are my drafted theory ideas sorry for the typos. REMEMBER you cannot put below in word for word you must rewrite it.The past two decades have seen a massive boom in the improvement, cultivation, standardization, accessibility, and affordability of computerized technology for the everyday consumer.This technical revolution has effectively created a mass standardization of technology that previously would have been far too expensive to reproduce for the public or for the average customer to consider buying.