The purpose of this assignment is to enhance the student’s clinical reasoning, confidence and learning of multiple pharmacological agents through facilitated discussion.
Description
In Week 6, you will create a PowerPoint Grand Rounds presentation on the topic assigned to you by the faculty member. In Week 7, you will lead a discussion based on your presentation as well as interact with peers in discussions related to their Grand Rounds presentations.
Course Outcomes
Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:
1. Describe the most commonly prescribed drugs use in primary care for the chose condition.
2. Utilize clinical guidelines, research articles or other materials to support your findings.
3. Identify any practice barriers, issues, or problems (including cultural diversity and healthcare literacy).
4. Discuss best practices for optimal outcomes.
Due Dates: Week 6: Grand Rounds PowerPoint Presentation due by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 6.
Week 7: Presentation must be uploaded to Week 7 discussion by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 6. Three responses to a peer’s presentations are due by Thursday 11:59 p.m. MT of Week 7, answers five questions in three different presentations (total of 15) and all follow-up posts to your presentation due by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7.
Grand Rounds PowerPoint Week 6
Category | Points | % | Description |
Case Study Presentation | 15 | Presents a narrated case using a fictional patient who presents to clinic with assigned medical condition. Provides detailed description of patient, patient’s current medical conditions, gender, race, age, weight vital signs, smoker non-smoker and current medications. Also include signs and symptoms of condition | |
Medication Management | 20 | Describes, in detail, the most commonly prescribed drugs for condition, including trade and generic names, typical dosages, mechanism of action, adverse effects, and major contraindications and interactions. Describes alternate therapies such as herbal medication, homeopathic methods; acupuncture, tai chi, yoga etc. Alternative therapies must apply to the students case study. | |
Evidence Based Support | 10 | Provides evidence from clinical guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources. Includes evidence from Dreischulte & Guthrie (2012) article. | |
Barriers to Practice | 5 | Describes potential barriers, issues, or problems related to disease process and prescribing, including potential issues related to cultural or socioeconomic diversity and healthcare literacy | |
Identifying Outcomes | 5 | Describe optimal outcomes after treatment with suggested medication | |
Test Questions | 15 | Includes five (5) knowledge-based questions related to presentation materials | |
Formatting | 5 | Slides are clear and easy to read. No more than 15 slides (excluding test question and reference slides) are submitted. Oral presentation is no less than 8 mins and no longer than 12 minutes .References use APA format. | |
Total | 75 | 100 | A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements. |
Grading Rubric PowerPoint Presentation- Week 6
Criterion | ExceptionalOutstanding or highest level of performance | ExceedsVery good or high level of performance | MeetsSatisfactory level of performance | Needs ImprovementPoor or failing level of performance | DevelopingUnsatisfactory level of performance |
ContentPossible Points = 70 | |||||
Case Study Presentation | 15 Points | 13 Points | 12 Points | 6 Points | 0 Points |
Presents a narrated Kaltura case using a fictional patient who presents to clinic with assigned medical condition. Provides detailed description of patient, including signs and symptoms of condition. | Presents a narrated Kaltura case using a fictional patient who presents to clinic with assigned medical condition. Provides detailed description of patient, but omits some signs and symptoms of condition. | Presents a narrated Kaltura case using a fictional patient who presents to clinic with assigned medical condition. Provides vague description of patient and omits some signs and symptoms of condition. | Presents a narrated Kaltura case using a fictional patient who presents to clinic with assigned medical condition, but does not provide description of patient, including signs and symptoms of condition. | Does not present a narrated case study. | |
Medication Management | 20 Points | 18 Points | 16 Points | 8 Points | 0 Points |
Describes, in detail, the first line prescribed drugs for condition, including trade and generic names, typical dosages, mechanism of action, adverse effects, and major contraindications and interactions. Describes alternate therapies. | Generally describes the first line prescribed drugs for condition, omitting one of the following: trade and generic names, typical dosages, mechanism of action, adverse effects, and major contraindications and interactions, and alternate therapies. | Generally describes the first line prescribed drugs for condition, omitting 2-3 of the following: trade and generic names, typical dosages, mechanism of action, adverse effects, and major contraindications and interactions, and alternate therapies. | Generally describes the first line prescribed drugs for condition, or incorrectly identifies first line drug, omitting 4 or more of the following: trade and generic names, typical dosages, mechanism of action, adverse effects, and major contraindications and interactions, and alternate therapies. | Does not describe medications for condition. | |
Evidence-Based Support | 10 Points | 9 Points | 8 Points | 4 Points | 0 Points |
Provides evidence from clinical guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources. Includes evidence from Dreischulte & Guthrie (2012) article. | Provides evidence from clinical guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources. Does not include evidence from Dreischulte & Guthrie (2012) article. | Provides evidence from sources other than clinical guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources. Includes evidence from Dreischulte & Guthrie (2012) article. | Provides evidence from sources other than clinical guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources. Does not include evidence from Dreischulte & Guthrie (2012) article. | Does not provide evidence to support. | |
Barriers to Practice | 5 Points | 4 Points | 3 Points | 1 Point | 0 Points |
Describes potential barriers, issues, or problems related to disease process and prescribing, including potential issues related to cultural or socioeconomic diversity and healthcare literacy. | Describes potential barriers, issues, or problems related to disease process and prescribing, but omits potential issues related to either cultural, socioeconomic diversity, or healthcare literacy. | Describes potential barriers, issues, or problems related to disease process and prescribing, but omits potential issues related to two of the following: cultural, socioeconomic diversity, or healthcare literacy. | Describes potential barriers, issues, or problems related to disease process and prescribing, but omits potential issues related to cultural, socioeconomic diversity, AND healthcare literacy. | Does not describe potential barriers. | |
Identifying Outcomes | 5 Points | 4 Points | 3 Points | 1 Point | 0 Points |
Describe optimal outcomes after treatment with suggested medication, including expected follow up care. | Describe optimal outcomes after treatment with suggested medication, does not include expected follow up care. | Incorrectly identifies optimal outcomes after treatment with suggested medication, including expected follow up care. | Incorrectly identifies optimal outcomes after treatment with suggested medication, does not include expected follow up care. | Does not address outcomes. | |
15 Points | 13 Points | 12 Points | 6 Points | 0 Points | |
Test Questions | Includes five (5) knowledge-based questions with correct responses related to presentation materials submitted as a comment to the assignment dropbox. | Includes four (4) knowledge-based questions with correct responses related to presentation materials submitted as a comment to the assignment dropbox.Can we just have the student add their questions to their presentation without the answer and discuss the answers durning week 7 | Includes two-three (2-3) knowledge-based questions related to presentation materialsORIncludes five (5) questions but does not include correct responses. | Includes one (1) knowledge-based question related to presentation materials. | Does not include questions. |
Content Subtotal | of 70 points | ||||
FormatPossible Points = 5 Points | |||||
Formatting | 5 Points | 0 Points | |||
Slides are clear and easy to read. No more than 15 slides (excluding test question and reference slides) are submitted. Oral presentation is no less than 8 mins and no longer than 12 minutes. References use APA format. | Slides are not clear and easy to read. More than 15 slides (excluding test question and reference slides) are submitted. Oral presentation is less than 8 mins or more than 12 minutes. References include errors in APA format. | ||||
Format Subtotal | of 75 points | ||||
Total Points | of 75 points |
Grand Rounds Discussion Week 7
Category | Points | % | Description | |
Leading the Discussion | 25 | Posts the narrated PowerPoint presentation(Kaltura) by Sunday 11:59 p.m. at the end of Week 6. Responds substantively to all peers who interact with PowerPoint presentation, and answers any faculty questions posted to discussion by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7. | ||
Participating in the Discussion | 10 | Responds substantively to at least three different peer presentations by Thursday 11:59 p.m. MT of Week 7. | ||
Identifying best practices | 20 | In participation responses to presentations, discusses a drug that could be prescribed for the condition DIFFERENT than those presented. Presents an alternate treatment plan from the Walmart or Target $4 RX list, and offers reasons for the change or if the drug is not on the list, why? Uses scholarly, evidenced based references to support responses. | ||
Responding to questions | 15 | Answers five (5) questions for three different presentations for a total of 15 questions. | ||
Format | 5 | Compose the posts in clear, concise, and organized manner using proper APA format, grammar and syntax. | ||
Total | 75 |
Grading Rubric Grand Rounds Discussion- Week 7
Criterion | ExceptionalOutstanding or highest level of performance | ExceedsVery good or high level of performance | MeetsSatisfactory level of performance | Needs ImprovementPoor or failing level of performance | DevelopingUnsatisfactory level of performance |
ContentPossible Points = 70 | |||||
Leading the Discussion | 25 Points | 22 Points | 21 Points | 10 Points | 0 Points |
Posts narrated PowerPoint presentation by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT of the end of Week 6. Responds substantively to all peers who interact with PowerPoint presentation, and answers any faculty questions posted to discussion by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7. | Posts narrated PowerPoint presentation by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT of the end of Week 6. Responds substantively to some peers who interact with PowerPoint presentation, and answers any faculty questions by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7. | Posts narrated PowerPoint presentation by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT of the end of Week 6. Responds with limited substance to some peers who interact with PowerPoint presentation, but does not answer faculty questions by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7. | Posts narrated PowerPoint presentation by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT of the end of Week 6. Responds to faculty questions, but does not respond to peers in own presentation discussion. | Does not post narrated PowerPoint presentation in the discussion. | |
10 Points | 9 Points | 8 Points | 4 Points | 0 Points | |
Participating in the Discussion | Student responds substantively to at least three different peer presentations by Thursday 11:59 p.m. MT. | Student responds substantively to at least two different peer presentations by Thursday 11:59 p.m. MT. | Student responds substantively to at least three different peer presentations by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT. | Student responds substantively to one peer presentation by Thursday 11:59 p.m. MT. | Student does not participate; or, student responds to less than three peer presentations by after Thursday 11:59 p.m. MT. |
Identifying Best Practices (Participant) | 20 Points | 18 Points | 16 Points | 8 Points | 0 Points |
In participation responses to presentations, discusses a drug that could be prescribed for the condition DIFFERENT than those presented. Presents an alternate treatment plan from the Walmart or Target $4 RX list, and offers reasons for the change or if the drug is not on the list, why? Uses scholarly, evidenced based references to support responses in ALL responses to presentations. | In participation responses to presentations, discusses a drug that could be prescribed for the condition DIFFERENT than those presented. Presents an alternate treatment plan from the Walmart or Target $4 RX list, but does not provide reasons for the change or why the drug is not on the list. Uses scholarly, evidenced based references to support responses in at least 2 responses to presentations. | In participation responses to presentations, discusses a drug that could be prescribed for the condition DIFFERENT than those presented. Does not present alternate treatment.Uses scholarly, evidenced based references to support responses in at least 2 responses to presentations. | In participation responses to presentations, discusses a drug that could be prescribed for the condition DIFFERENT than those presented. Does not present alternate treatment. Does not provide scholarly, evidence based references. | Does not provide substantive responses to peer presentations. Does not include different drugs nor provide scholarly resources. | |
Responding to questions (Participant) | 15 Points | 13 Points | 12 Points | 6 Points | 0 Points |
Answers five questions for three different presentations for a total of fifteen questions. | Answers three-four questions for three different presentations for a total of nine-twelve questions. | Answers three-five questions for two different presentations for a total of six-ten questions. | Answers three-five questions for one presentation. | Does not answer presentation questions. | |
Content Subtotal | _____of 70 points | ||||
FormatPossible Points = 5 Points | |||||
Grammar, APA Formatting, Syntax, Spelling, & Punctuation | 5 Points | 4 Points | 3 Points | 1 Point | 0 Points |
APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate, or with zero to one errors. | Two to four errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted. | Five to seven errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted. | More than 7 errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted. | Post contains ten or more errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation or repeatedly makes the same errors after faculty feedback. | |
Format Subtotal | of 5 points | ||||
Total Points | of 75 points |
NR508 Directions & Rubric.docx revised 10/18 jbb/kk | 1 |
Try it now!
How it works?
Follow these simple steps to get your paper done
Place your order
Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.
Proceed with the payment
Choose the payment system that suits you most.
Receive the final file
Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.
Our Services
Ace Writing Center has stood as the world’s leading custom essay writing services providers. Once you enter all the details in the order form under the place order button, the rest is up to us.
Essays
At Ace Writing Center, Nowadays, students normally have extremely busy schedules. You will note that some of them have to take on some evening or weekend jobs in order to get some income that can help them to sustain in college or in the university. This can deny them a chance to write all the essays given. Others usually get bombarded with a lot of work by their lecturers. This can still delay such students from working on all their essays. However, some of them usually try to work on all these essays but end up delivering their work late. This can prevent them from graduating since most lecturers are strict on deadlines. If you want to write a business essay, the wise way is to hire an outstanding essay writing service like us, so that you can get the best results. If you are keen, you will note that many companies usually overcharge their customers. Some of them are there only to make money. And in reality, they really don’t care to build a long term commitment with students. You should not choose such companies. You should take your time and choose a reliable company to work with. Ace Writing Center is the ultimate solution for you. We have been offering our writing service for more than 7 years. This is a clear indication that you will get quality essay writing service. We have a wide range of writers who can work on any business essay that you might have. We believe in doing extensive research so that we can provide quality work to all our clients. .
Admissions
Admission and Business Papers
Have you ever had to write an admission essay for college? The majority of students face the same issues when applying to a university or college and many in such situations decide they need professional help to cope with this matter. They get in a situation when the deadline keeps coming closer but lack motivation to start because they are just not sure if their writing skills are strong enough. We have a solution for you! Ace Writing Center is the best admission essay writing service with a large professional team and years of experience in providing high-quality papers to students of all levels and faculties. The mission of our team is to help students make their dreams of entering a good college come true and that’s what we offer!.
Editing
Editing and Proofreading
Sometimes all the words for your paper just flow out of your mind and into your fingers. You type quickly at your keyboard and there they are, your beautiful words right there on the screen. But you have no idea how to polish it up. You may be wishing there was a paper writing service that offered this type of writing service. Look no more! Here at Ace Writing Center, we offer you an editing and proofreading option that you can't find anywhere else..
Coursework
College Essay Writing
In case you are familiar Ace Writing Center, you know the way to distinguish a better company from a cheap one exactly. First of all, poor service website does not have a sufficient support. We think support team is an essential part of success; it has to answer all clients’ questions and be a connecting link between clients and their writers. On our web-service you will get answers about anything you need and your writer will receive all your instructions, assignments and requirements exactly and swiftly. A writing service that we run has got a flexible pricing system that will save you from senseless wastes and many bonus systems that let you sparing money for something important for you.