NURS3003/ NURS3003B assignment 2 Marking Guide.

NURS3003/NURS3003B assignment 2 Marking GuideNURS3003/NURS3003B assignment 2 Marking Guide.Unsatisfactory Marginal Good Very Good ExcellentIntroduction Your introduction rambles and should be more concise. It does not provide a clear indication of the focus of your paper nor how you intend to approach this paper in the body of your assignment. A satisfactory introduction that introduces the topic. However, you also need a more descriptive account of how you intend to approach this paper. That is how you intend to present the ideas from the literature in the body of your paper. A good introduction that introduces the topic in a broad way with limited background to the topic. Clearly outlines how you intend to approach this paper in the body of this assignment A very clear introduction that introduces the topic, defines major key terms, and introduces the main argument for this paper and clearly states the position taken. An excellent introduction that begins by introducing the topic in a broad way and shows you have a good understanding of the chosen topic. You also provide a clear outline of how you intend to approach this paper, the position taken and counter arguments.Organization/development of the essay is well planned, complete, coherent Logic of arguments is not made clear. There is no or little sequencing of the information; flow of information lacks coherence and is therefore difficult to follow.Very few objectives were metSome understanding of the topic shown. Some links and connections between ideas. Some arguments are not clear but the reader can follow the general gist of the discussion.The writer demonstrated a satisfactory understanding of the topic.Some major objectives were not met.Information presented in a logical sequence which can be followed by the reader. Points were usually relevant. A few minor points are confusing.The writer demonstrated a solid understanding of the topicMost aspects of the topic were covered and most of the objectives were metGood understanding of the topic is shown. Links and connections between ideas made clear. Information was relevant and expressed in own words. Points were developed with sufficient and appropriate details.All aspects of the topic were covered and all objectives met effectively.A very good understanding of the topic is shown. Links and connections between ideas were made clear. Information was relevant and expressed in own words. Points were developed with clear and appropriate details – made connections, inferences, drew conclusions, noted convergences and divergences among resources.Research: (use of varied sources, evaluation and validated sources, accurate information) Information is unreliable and or inaccurate. Resources are not valid. Major sections of pertinent content have been omitted.Did not filter out irrelevant articles and instead appeared to rely on the top “web hits”Discussion contained material to support the main arguments. Some material unrelated to the main arguments.Limited critical appraisal of sources with limited identification of controversies and or knowledge gaps.Appeared to represent only one side of issue, however information is accurate.Information is mostly accurate with only a few minor errors; resources good but nor varied enough.Some critical appraisal of the resources with limited identification of controversies and/or knowledge gapsResources are legitimate and varied where appropriate. Broad spectrum of information provided – e.g. political, social, economic dimensions which were clearly related to the issues/topic.Critical appraisal of the resources with identification of major controversies or knowledge gapsSubstantive use of information – e.g. explanations of political, economic, social dimensions in relation to the issue/subject area. Use of varied sources, evaluated and validated sources, accurate informationPresentation of material was original and presented in a creative way which held the reader’s attentionScholarly writing Essay format attempted but structure not achieved. No or limited evidence of editing of content for relevance to the discussion.Writing lacks logical continuity.Poor spelling and grammar -this distracts from the information you are trying to convey.Correct grammar, spelling, punctuation, sentence and paragraph construction. Essay format generally successfully achieved but requires refinement. Articulation of relevance of content reasonably effective. Logical sequencing of ideas. Argumentative paraphrasing effective. Effective articulation of relevance of content.Effective argumentative structure. Relationship of paraphrasing and development of ideas effective successful integration of argumentative text A highly organized and structured paper that highlights your thinking and addresses the assessment requirementsA high level of clarity or expressionChoose one of the cases from CaseWorld that are linked to this topic. From the available data in the case study identify and discuss the potential barriers to effective planning for transition of care for the person in the case study. It is expected that your discussion will address factors such as but not limited to:the adequacy of the information provided in the case study and what further information is needed so that you as the nurse could develop a plan for the ongoing care of this person post hospitalisation.how assumptions about pathophysiological, psychological, cultural, spiritual and social processes potentially impact on the provision of care the person in the case study and people in general with long-term health care needs in a community or extended care setting. For Mrs Elizabeth Green is a 78-year-old lady who lives alone in a single storey unit. Elizabeth has one son and daughter and 5 grandchildren. Elizabeth was washing the dishes at home this morning when she experienced 10 minutes of unrelieved central chest and left shoulder pain. After calling an ambulance Elizabeth was admitted to the ED and after review by the Cardiac Team.Choose one of the cases from CaseWorld that are linked to this topic. From the available data in the case study identify and discuss the potential barriers to effective planning for transition of care for the person in the case study. It is expected that your discussion will address factors such as but not limited to: the adequacy of the information provided in the case study and what further information is needed so that you as the nurse could develop a plan for the ongoing care of this person post hospitalisation.how assumptions about pathophysiological, psychological, cultural, spiritual and social processes potentially impact on the provision of care the person in the case study and people in general with long-term health care needs in a community or extended care setting. For Mrs Elizabeth Green is a 78-year-old lady who lives alone in a single storey unit. Elizabeth has one son and daughter and 5 grandchildren. Elizabeth was washing the dishes at home this morning when she experienced 10 minutes of unrelieved central chest and left shoulder pain. After calling an ambulance Elizabeth was admitted to the ED and after review by the Cardiac Team.