Managing organizations and leading people task 2Introduction:For this task, you will conduct an evaluation of your personal leadership style. You will write a 6-10 page paper evaluating your own leadership practices using a scholarly leadership theory that is different from the one you used in task 1. To help you refine your own leadership skills, you will develop at least two SMART (specific, measurable, achievable, realistic, and timely) goals as part of your evaluation.Requirements:A. Conduct a leadership evaluation of your own leadership by doing the following:1. Provide a completed copy of the attached “Seven Habits Profile.”Note: You will be required to attach a completed copy of the “Seven Habits Profile” to the task submission. The attachment may be a scanned document or photo.a. Reflect on the results of your Seven Habits Profile, including what those results might indicate about your leadership style.2. Evaluate your leadership practice by doing the following:Note: As part of your evaluation, you will need to use one scholarly leadership theory and three scholarly sources.a. Evaluate three strengths of your leadership practice using a scholarly leadership theory.Note: You should use a leadership theory that is different from the leadership theory you used in task 1.b. Evaluate three weaknesses of your leadership practice using the same scholarly leadership theory you used in part A2a.c. Recommend three theory-based changes that you could make to maximize your success in managing organizations and leading people in the future, using the same scholarly leadership theory you used in part A2a.Note: All theories must be supported.d. Discuss two short-term SMART goals that will help improve your leadership practice.Note: All the components of the SMART model must be met for each goal. This model required objectives to be: (a) specific, (b) measurable, (c) achievable or attainable, (d) realistic or relevant, and (e) time-bound or time-based.i. Discuss at least two specific actions you will take to reach each of the SMART goals discussed in part A2d.e. Include three scholarly sources that support your evaluation of your own leadership practice.Note: A scholarly source could be a reputable journal, a published book, any source from a university faculty member or business leader. Also, any article or book in the online WGU library.B. When you use sources, include all in-text citations and references in APA format.Note: For definitions of terms commonly used in the rubric, see the Rubric Terms web link included in the Evaluation Procedures section.Note: When using sources to support ideas and elements in an assessment, the submission MUST include APA formatted in-text citations with a corresponding reference list for any direct quotes or paraphrasing. It is not necessary to list sources that were consulted if they have not been quoted or paraphrased in the text of the assessment.Note: No more than a combined total of 30% of a submission can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from outside sources, even if cited correctly. For tips on using APA style, please refer to the APA Handout web link included in the APA Guidelines section.Rubric:rticulation of Response (clarity, organization, mechanics)The candidate provides unsatisfactory articulation of response. The candidate provides weak articulation of response. The candidate provides limited articulation of response. The candidate provides adequate articulation of response. The candidate provides substantial articulation of response.A1. Copy of “Seven Habits Profile”The candidate does not provide a completed copy of the attached “Seven Habits Profile.” Not applicable. Not applicable. Not applicable. The candidate provides a completed copy of the attached “Seven Habits Profile.”A1a. Reflection on Seven Habits ProfileThe candidate does not provide a relevant reflection on the results of the Seven Habits Profile, including what the results might indicate about the candidate’s leadership style. The candidate provides a relevant reflection, with no detail, on the results of the Seven Habits Profile, including what the results might indicate about the candidate’s leadership style. The candidate provides a relevant reflection, with limited detail, on the results of the Seven Habits Profile, including what the results might indicate about the candidate’s leadership style. The candidate provides a relevant reflection, with adequate detail, on the results of the Seven Habits Profile, including what the results might indicate about the candidate’s leadership style. The candidate provides a relevant reflection, with substantial detail, on the results of the Seven Habits Profile, including what the results might indicate about the candidate’s leadership style.A2a. Personal Leadership StrengthsThe candidate does not provide a logical evaluation of any strengths of the candidate’s leadership practice using a scholarly leadership theory. The candidate provides a logical evaluation of 1–2 strengths of the candidate’s leadership practice using a scholarly leadership theory. The candidate provides a logical evaluation, with limited support, of 3 strengths of the candidate’s leadership practice using a scholarly leadership theory. The candidate provides a logical evaluation, with adequate support, of 3 strengths of the candidate’s leadership practice using a scholarly leadership theory. The candidate provides a logical evaluation, with substantial support, of 3 strengths of the candidate’s leadership practice using a scholarly leadership theory.A2b. Personal Leadership WeaknessesThe candidate does not provide a logical evaluation of any weaknesses of the candidate’s leadership practice using the same scholarly leadership theory used in part A2a. The candidate provides a logical evaluation of 1–2 weaknesses of the candidate’s leadership practice using the same scholarly leadership theory used in part A2a. The candidate provides a logical evaluation, with limited support, of 3 weaknesses of the candidate’s leadership practice using the same scholarly leadership theory used in part A2a. The candidate provides a logical evaluation, with adequate support, of 3 weaknesses of the candidate’s leadership practice using the same scholarly leadership theory used in part A2a. The candidate provides a logical evaluation, with substantial support, of 3 weaknesses of the candidate’s leadership practice using the same scholarly leadership theory used in part A2a.A2c. Recommendation for Personal LeadershipThe candidate does not provide an appropriate recommendation of any theory-based changes to maximize success in managing organizations and leading people in the future, using the same scholarly leadership theory used in part A2a. The candidate provides an appropriate recommendation of 1–2 theory-based changes to maximize success in managing organizations and leading people in the future, using the same scholarly leadership theory used in part A2a. The candidate provides an appropriate recommendation, with limited support, of 3 theory-based changes to maximize success in managing organizations and leading people in the future, using the same scholarly leadership theory used in part A2a. The candidate provides an appropriate recommendation, with adequate support, of 3 theory-based changes to maximize success in managing organizations and leading people in the future, using the same scholarly leadership theory used in part A2a. The candidate provides an appropriate recommendation, with substantial support, of 3 theory-based changes to maximize success in managing organizations and leading people in the future, using the same scholarly leadership theory used in part A2a.A2d. SMART GoalsThe candidate does not provide a logical discussion of any short-term SMART goals that will help improve the candidate’s leadership practice. The candidate provides a logical discussion of 1 short-term SMART goal that will help improve the candidate’s leadership practice. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of 2 short-term SMART goals that will help improve the candidate’s leadership practice. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of 2 short-term SMART goals that will help improve the candidate’s leadership practice. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of 2 short-term SMART goals that will help improve the candidate’s leadership practice.A2di. Specific ActionsThe candidate does not provide a logical discussion of any specific actions that will be taken to reach each of the SMART goals discussed in part A2d. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of at least 2 specific actions that will be taken to reach each of the SMART goals discussed in part A2d. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of at least 2 specific actions that will be taken to reach each of the SMART goals discussed in part A2d. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of at least 2 specific actions that will be taken to reach each of the SMART goals discussed in part A2d. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of at least 2 specific actions that will be taken to reach each of the SMART goals discussed in part A2d.A2e. Scholarly Sources for Self-EvaluationThe candidate does not provide any scholarly sources to support the evaluation of the candidate’s leadership practice. Not applicable. The candidate provides 1–2 scholarly sources to support the evaluation of the candidate’s leadership practice.Not applicable. The candidate provides 3 scholarly sources to support the evaluation of the candidate’s leadership practice.B. SourcesWhen thecandidateuses sources,the candidatedoes notprovide in-textcitationsand references. When thecandidateuses sources,the candidateprovides onlysome in-textcitationsandreferences. When thecandidateuses sources,the candidateprovidesappropriatein-textcitationsandreferenceswith majordeviationsfrom APAstyle. When thecandidateuses sources,the candidateprovidesappropriatein-textcitationsandreferenceswith minordeviationsfrom APAstyle. When thecandidateusessources, thecandidateprovidesappropriatein-textcitationsandreferenceswith noreadilydetectabledeviationsfrom APAstyle, ORthecandidatedoes not usesources.Attachments:
Try it now!
How it works?
Follow these simple steps to get your paper done
Place your order
Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.
Proceed with the payment
Choose the payment system that suits you most.
Receive the final file
Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.
Our Services
Ace Writing Center has stood as the world’s leading custom essay writing services providers. Once you enter all the details in the order form under the place order button, the rest is up to us.
Essays
At Ace Writing Center, Nowadays, students normally have extremely busy schedules. You will note that some of them have to take on some evening or weekend jobs in order to get some income that can help them to sustain in college or in the university. This can deny them a chance to write all the essays given. Others usually get bombarded with a lot of work by their lecturers. This can still delay such students from working on all their essays. However, some of them usually try to work on all these essays but end up delivering their work late. This can prevent them from graduating since most lecturers are strict on deadlines. If you want to write a business essay, the wise way is to hire an outstanding essay writing service like us, so that you can get the best results. If you are keen, you will note that many companies usually overcharge their customers. Some of them are there only to make money. And in reality, they really don’t care to build a long term commitment with students. You should not choose such companies. You should take your time and choose a reliable company to work with. Ace Writing Center is the ultimate solution for you. We have been offering our writing service for more than 7 years. This is a clear indication that you will get quality essay writing service. We have a wide range of writers who can work on any business essay that you might have. We believe in doing extensive research so that we can provide quality work to all our clients. .
Admissions
Admission and Business Papers
Have you ever had to write an admission essay for college? The majority of students face the same issues when applying to a university or college and many in such situations decide they need professional help to cope with this matter. They get in a situation when the deadline keeps coming closer but lack motivation to start because they are just not sure if their writing skills are strong enough. We have a solution for you! Ace Writing Center is the best admission essay writing service with a large professional team and years of experience in providing high-quality papers to students of all levels and faculties. The mission of our team is to help students make their dreams of entering a good college come true and that’s what we offer!.
Editing
Editing and Proofreading
Sometimes all the words for your paper just flow out of your mind and into your fingers. You type quickly at your keyboard and there they are, your beautiful words right there on the screen. But you have no idea how to polish it up. You may be wishing there was a paper writing service that offered this type of writing service. Look no more! Here at Ace Writing Center, we offer you an editing and proofreading option that you can't find anywhere else..
Coursework
College Essay Writing
In case you are familiar Ace Writing Center, you know the way to distinguish a better company from a cheap one exactly. First of all, poor service website does not have a sufficient support. We think support team is an essential part of success; it has to answer all clients’ questions and be a connecting link between clients and their writers. On our web-service you will get answers about anything you need and your writer will receive all your instructions, assignments and requirements exactly and swiftly. A writing service that we run has got a flexible pricing system that will save you from senseless wastes and many bonus systems that let you sparing money for something important for you.
